In a recent wave of transparency, Representative Eric Burlison has raised concerns about what he describes as “shady programs” – government initiatives that operate with a lack of public disclosure and clarity about their funding and purpose.
This call to action highlights an ongoing struggle within the centers of power, where the balance between national security and the public’s right to know is delicate.
Representative Burlison’s position is not without precedent. History is replete with examples where the veil of secrecy has been lifted, revealing programs ranging from the controversial to the mundane. The representative’s plea for openness reflects a broader societal demand for accountability and informed citizens.
The debate is complex and multifaceted. On the one hand, there is an undeniable need to keep certain operations confidential for reasons of national security. On the other hand, the democratic process thrives on transparency and the public’s ability to hold its leaders accountable.
Finding the middle ground is a task that requires wisdom, foresight and commitment to the principles of governance.
“When [Rep. Tim] Burchett asked for some data. They said they had not received any data from the Navy. That’s pretty alarming,” representative Eric Burlison exclusively shared Ask a Pol.
“But it’s been over a year and AARO isn’t getting all the information they want. I mean, they said they generally cooperate, but at the end of the day they don’t get a piece of it.”
As the conversation progresses, it becomes clear that this is more than a matter of secret documents or undisclosed budgets. It’s a matter of trust – trust in the institutions designed to protect us, and trust in those we choose to make decisions on our behalf. It is a dialogue that goes to the heart of what it means to be an informed participant in the democratic process.
Representative Burlison’s call for input on investigative steps is a step toward bridging the gap between the government and the governed.
“Probably the vast majority of these, of the photos and videos, are fake. Or they are photos of things that are not necessarily UAP,” Burlison said.
“And that said, I don’t think AARO is done yet. They still have some work to do. And I don’t think our work should be done either. And at the end of the day, we still have shady programs spending money that we have no answer to.”
