In recent weeks, a major revelation has come to light about the U.S. government’s handling of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), often referred to as UFOs. A new whistleblower, backed by credible sources, has come forward with claims that the Pentagon is withholding critical information about UAPs from both the public and Congress. This exposé has sent ripples through the UFO and defense communities as it exposes the existence of a secret, unrecognized Special Access Program (USAP) within the United States Department of Defense (DoD).
The whistleblower’s accusations
The whistleblower, whose identity has been verified by multiple reliable sources, claims the Pentagon is running a clandestine UAP program. This program, hidden from oversight, operates outside the bounds of Congress’s normal reporting procedures. According to the whistleblower, important information about UAPs has been kept secret from Congress, and therefore from the American people. This individual has provided a detailed report to Congress outlining the illegal withholding of information and raising allegations that could have far-reaching consequences for the U.S. government and its intelligence practices.
Veteran journalist Michael Shellenberger, who recently appeared on the podcast “The Joe Rogan Experience,” further corroborated these claims. Shellenberger reported that he has spoken to multiple insiders, some of whom are terrified to come forward because of the lack of whistleblower protections for those who reveal classified information about UAPs.
Unrecognized Special Access Programs (USAPs)
The core of the whistleblower’s claims revolves around the existence of unrecognized special access programs, or USAPs. These programs are shrouded in secrecy and not disclosed to most members of Congress, including those in key oversight positions. USAPs are known only to a select few individuals within the government and military, and their existence can be denied under the threat of torture, Shellenberger’s report said. The whistleblower’s report specifically reveals the name of such a program, which is allegedly linked to the UAP phenomenon known as ‘Immaculate Constellation’.
The U.S. federal government uses Special Access Programs (SAPs) to protect highly classified information. SAPs are designed to restrict access to sensitive intelligence or military operations, but USAPs go a step further by denying the existence of the program itself. Individuals informed about these programs are sworn to confidentiality and must deny any knowledge of them, even under intense surveillance.
Historical context: The origins of special access programs
The development of special access programs can be traced back to the early days of World War II, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Executive Order 8381 in 1940, establishing three levels of classification: restricted, confidential, and secret. After the war, President Harry Truman introduced a new level, “top secret,” while President Dwight D. Eisenhower further formalized the system. Over time, the Pentagon created its own special access labels to protect classified information from outside influences. This eventually led to the creation of SAPs and USAPs.
What sets USAPs apart is the Pentagon’s ability to completely deny their existence, even to high-ranking government officials, making them virtually immune to surveillance. The whistleblower claims that these programs have been operating outside the law for decades, without the knowledge of most members of Congress.
Growing concerns and upcoming hearings
The upcoming hearings on November 13, led by Representative Nancy Mace, are expected to address these allegations and shed light on the Pentagon’s handling of UAP-related information. Mace, known for her straightforward approach, has expressed her desire to bring forward individuals who have first-hand knowledge of these secret programs. Insiders say this hearing could be a pivotal moment in uncovering the truth behind the government’s involvement with UAPs.
In recent years, the topic of UAPs has received increasing attention, especially after the US Navy released videos showing unidentified craft displaying flight capabilities far beyond current human technology. These revelations have sparked public interest and led to a wave of whistleblowers. David Grusch, a former intelligence officer, made headlines earlier this year by revealing the existence of secret UAP programs. The whistleblower’s latest testimony builds on Grusch’s claims and provides further evidence of an ongoing cover-up within the Department of Defense.
What could the UAP whistleblower’s claims mean?
If the whistleblower’s allegations prove true, it could mean that the US government has been withholding potentially groundbreaking information about extraterrestrial or interdimensional life for decades. Some insiders believe UAPs could represent advanced technology from foreign adversaries or even non-human intelligence. Others, including Shellenberger, remain cautiously skeptical but acknowledge that the whistleblower’s claims are credible and deserve serious investigation.
The whistleblower also points to a worrying lack of transparency within the US government, especially when it comes to oversight of intelligence agencies and military operations. By keeping Congress in the dark, the Pentagon may be violating constitutional laws that require disclosure of such programs to certain elected officials.
VIDEO: Chris Lehto – New UAP Whistleblower EXPOSES the Pentagon’s Secret UFO Program!
As the November hearings approach, the world watches with anticipation. Will the US government finally make clear what it knows about UAPs? Or will these claims be denied, as in the past? The whistleblower’s testimony, combined with corroborating evidence from other insiders, suggests we are on the brink of a major revelation.
Transparency, as the whistleblower and Shellenberger emphasize, is the key to restoring trust in government institutions. Whether the UAP phenomenon represents extraterrestrial life, advanced foreign technology, or something else entirely, one thing is clear: the American public deserves answers, and Congress must do its duty to thoroughly investigate these claims.
The upcoming hearings could be a turning point in our understanding of UAPs, and the whistleblower’s courage in coming forward could help lift the veil of secrecy that has surrounded the topic for far too long. As the conversation shifts from speculation to concrete evidence, we may finally get closer to uncovering the truth about UAPs and their implications for humanity.
