Richard Dolan, a leading UFO historian, delves into the evolving terminology and its implications in his insightful analysis of “The Richard Dolan Show.” The shift from ‘UFO’ to ‘UAP’ and from ‘Disclosure’ to ‘Transparency’ is more than just semantics; it reflects a broader social and institutional attitude towards these phenomena and attempts at narrative control.
The evolution of terminology
In the early days of UFO sightings, the term “flying saucers” was often used. This term had connotations of science fiction and public hysteria, which often overshadowed serious investigations. Over time, the term evolved into “unidentified flying objects” (UFOs), a phrase coined by the US military to add a veneer of scientific objectivity and bureaucratic stability to the study of these phenomena.
However, in recent years there has been a notable shift towards the term ‘unidentified aerial phenomena’ (UAP) and more recently ‘unidentified anomalous phenomena’. This transition reflects an ongoing effort to rebrand and destigmatize the topic, making it more palatable for scholarly inquiry and public discussion. Dr. Richard Haynes, a NASA scientist and active UFO researcher, is credited with popularizing the term UAP in the 1990s, with the aim of dispelling the cultural baggage associated with UFOs and encouraging serious research.
From openness to transparency
For decades, the UFO community has championed the concept of “disclosure,” which involves the disclosure of hidden or classified information about UFOs by an established authority, often presented as a dramatic, definitive disclosure by the president or other high-ranking official. This idea of disclosure suggests a moment of truth, when the existence and nature of UFOs would be laid bare for public scrutiny.
In contrast, the term ‘transparency’ has recently come into use, especially in political and military circles. Transparency involves an ongoing process of openness and accountability, but lacks the promise of full or final revelation. This shift from “disclosure” to “transparency” can be seen as a form of virtue signaling, providing an appearance of accountability while still allowing those in power to control the narrative and extent of information released.
The role of language in shaping perception
Dolan emphasizes the power of language in shaping public perception and controlling narratives. He draws parallels with George Carlin’s criticism of ‘soft language’, which dilutes the truth and makes serious issues seem less direct and real. Similarly, George Orwell’s exploration of political jargon and euphemisms in “Politics and the English Language” highlights how language can obscure harsh realities and manipulate public thinking.
The rebranding of UFOs to UAPs and the shift from disclosure to transparency can be seen as modern examples of these language strategies. By changing terminology, authorities can influence how the public perceives and discusses these phenomena, often reducing the urgency and changing the nature of the conversation.
Implications for the future
While the shift to UAP and emphasis on transparency have opened the door to broader discussions and bipartisan support in Congress, they also come with potential pitfalls. The term UAP covers a wide range of phenomena, including objects in the air that cannot be immediately identified. This broad definition can dilute the focus on truly unexplained phenomena and make it easier for authorities to ignore or downplay important observations.
Furthermore, the promise of transparency without a commitment to full disclosure can lead to continued confusion and control over the narrative. As Dolan notes, the institutional structures that have grown around UFO secrecy over the past 80 years are deeply entrenched, involving significant financial interests and powerful players. True disclosure, if it ever comes, will likely be disruptive and challenge the status quo.
In conclusion, Richard Dolan’s analysis of “The Richard Dolan Show” sheds light on the significant shifts in language and terminology surrounding UFOs and UAPs. Understanding these changes is critical for anyone interested in the study of unidentified phenomena and the broader social and institutional forces at play. The transition from UFO disclosure to UAP transparency reflects deeper efforts in narrative control and highlights the ongoing challenges in achieving true openness and understanding in this puzzling field.
