One compelling hypothesis suggests that UAP sightings increase during times of heightened geopolitical tension, especially when the threat of nuclear war increases.
Over the past five years, as the Doomsday Clock ticks closer to midnight, reports of UFO activity have increased dramatically. This pattern is consistent with claims that NHIs are deeply concerned about the destructive potential of nuclear weapons, not only for humanity but for the planet itself.
This theory posits that NHIs may possess the ability to monitor and even neutralize nuclear arsenals. Reports from military personnel detailed incidents in which UFOs reportedly hovered over nuclear silos, temporarily disabling the launch systems. Could this be a conscious message: “We are watching you, and we will not let you destroy your world”?
The great nuclear bluff?
Another intriguing angle is the idea that nuclear weapons may not work the way we think they do. Some theorists argue that NHIs have rendered these weapons useless, perhaps through advanced technology or a fundamental suppression of nuclear capabilities. If true, it would explain the extraordinary secrecy surrounding nuclear arsenals and the geopolitical posture based on their deterrent value.
This could also explain the almost universal agreement among nuclear powers to prevent new countries from developing nuclear weapons. The sudden halt of nuclear testing by major powers – since 1992 for the US and 1990 for Russia – adds fuel to this speculation.
If these weapons are, as some claim, “expensive paperweights,” their value lies in perception rather than in practice. Any public revelation of this truth could destabilize global power structures.
The last confirmed nuclear test took place in September 2017, when North Korea carried out its sixth nuclear detonation. If UFOs are indeed concerned about humanity’s use of nuclear weapons, why have their reported activities not intensified around North Korea, a state that remains openly defiant in its nuclear ambitions?
One possibility is that UFOs were initially unaware of North Korea’s entry into the nuclear arena. North Korea’s relatively isolated position on the world stage could pose a unique challenge, even for an alien intelligence service.
Unlike during the Cold War, when nuclear tensions were centralized around two dominant powers, the multipolar and less predictable nature of today’s nuclear landscape could complicate their apparent strategy.
This hypothesis not only expands the scope of the ‘nuclear nexus’ theory, but also suggests that the actions – or inactions – of these unidentified entities depend on how they pose potential risks to humanity or the planet prioritize as a whole.
If this is true, North Korea’s nuclear program, while important, could still be considered less immediately threatening than a full-scale nuclear standoff involving multiple superpowers.
A curious incident often mentioned in these discussions is the Ballistic missile alert 2018 in Hawaii, which turned out to be a false alarm. Although the official statement attributes this to human error, it may have been a test of public response – or even a moment of actual intervention.
If NHIs monitor nuclear capabilities, such events could be attempts to prevent accidents or send messages to governments that their actions are under scrutiny.
First-hand accounts from military personnel lend further credence to these ideas.
New players, old rules
The entry of new nuclear powers, such as North Korea, into this delicate equation raises questions about how this dynamic plays out on the global stage. If NHIs indeed neutralize nuclear capabilities, why would they allow testing by countries like North Korea?
These tests may initially remain under the radar, but later lead to intervention. Alternatively, established nuclear powers can act as intermediaries and enforce the ‘rules’ of the NHIs.
Some analysts argue that the world’s major powers maintain a facade of unity when it comes to nuclear weapons precisely because the illusion of their functionality is essential to global stability.
Any deviation from this narrative – such as a new nation exposing the ineffectiveness of nuclear weapons – could unravel decades of strategic posturing.
The idea that NHIs are actively interfering with our nuclear capabilities leads to another question: why?
Some argue that NHIs have vested interests in Earth’s ecosystems and may view humanity’s nuclear ambitions as a threat to their own existence. If they share our planet – whether underwater, underground or even in parallel dimensions – they would have every reason to avoid a nuclear catastrophe that could endanger their habitats.
Dr. Michael Salla, a scholar of international politics and a prominent figure in the field of ufology, has discussed theories in which alien civilizations – interdimensional or otherwise – could be engaging with humanity’s nuclear capabilities and uses.
He suggests that such entities may have intervened to prevent the use of nuclear weapons, especially after incidents such as UFO sightings near military bases and nuclear facilities.
There’s also a more troubling possibility: the NHIs could see humanity as an experiment, and preventing nuclear war is a way to safeguard their “investment.”
This perspective portrays NHIs as coolly pragmatic, intervening not out of altruism, but to ensure the survival of a resource they find valuable – be it the planet’s biodiversity or humanity itself.
If governments have evidence that NHIs are monitoring or interfering with nuclear sites, the public deserves to know. With so much at stake, understanding the true nature of these interactions could provide a path to de-escalation and a future less burdened by the shadow of nuclear war.
After the hearings yesterday I was fortunate to have a meeting @RepNancyMace
Initially the meeting was for me to ask questions, but instead we chose to have her meet my good friend Bob Salas, and @SteveBassett to further the conversation and create real change.… pic.twitter.com/HehqaiWNQX
— Total Disclosure Podcast (@DisclosurePod) November 14, 2024
